Put option

4 stars based on 34 reviews

In finance, a put or put option is a stock market device which gives the owner of a put the right, but not the obligation, to sell an asset the underlyingat a specified price the strikeby a preis der put-options date the expiry or maturity to a given party the seller preis der put-options the put. The purchase of a put preis der put-options is interpreted as a negative sentiment about the future value of the underlying. Put options are most commonly used in the stock market to protect against the decline of the price of a stock below a specified price.

In this way the buyer of the put will receive at least the strike price specified, even if the asset is currently worthless. If the strike is Kand at time t the value of the underlying is S tthen in an American option the buyer can exercise the put for a payout of K-S t any time until the option's maturity time T. The put yields a positive return only if the security price falls below the strike when the option is exercised.

A European option can only be exercised at time T rather than any time until Tand preis der put-options Bermudan option can be exercised only on specific dates listed in the preis der put-options of the contract. If the option is not exercised by maturity, it expires worthless. The buyer will not preis der put-options the option at an allowable date if the price of the underlying is greater than K. The most obvious use of a put is as a type of insurance.

In the protective put strategy, the investor buys enough puts to cover his holdings of the underlying so preis der put-options if a drastic downward movement of the underlying's price occurs, he has the option to sell the holdings at the strike price.

Preis der put-options use is for speculation: Puts may also be combined with other derivatives as part of more complex investment strategies, and in particular, may be useful for hedging.

By put-call paritya European put can be replaced by buying the appropriate call option and selling an appropriate forward contract. The terms for exercising the option's right to sell it differ depending on option style. A European put option allows the holder to exercise the put option for a short period of time right before expiration, while an American put option allows exercise at any time before expiration.

The put buyer either believes that the underlying asset's price will fall by the exercise date or hopes to protect a long position in it. The advantage preis der put-options buying a put over short selling the asset is that the option owner's risk of loss is limited to the premium paid for it, whereas the asset short seller's risk of loss is unlimited its price can rise greatly, in fact, in theory it can rise infinitely, and such a rise is the short seller's loss.

The put writer believes that the underlying security's price will rise, not fall. The writer sells the put to collect the premium. The put writer's total potential loss is limited to the put's strike price less the spot and premium already received. Puts can be used also to limit the writer's portfolio risk and may be part of an option spread.

That is, the buyer wants the value of the put option to increase by a decline in the price of the underlying asset below the strike price. The writer seller of a put is long on the underlying asset and short on the put preis der put-options itself. That is, the seller wants the option to become worthless by an increase in the price of the underlying asset above the strike price. Generally, a put option that is purchased is referred to as a long put and a put option that is sold is referred to as a short put.

A naked putalso called an uncovered putpreis der put-options a put option whose writer the seller does not have a position in the underlying stock or other instrument.

This strategy is best used by investors who want to accumulate a position in the underlying stock, but only if the price is low enough.

If the buyer fails to exercise the options, then the writer keeps the option premium as a "gift" for playing the game. If the underlying stock's market price is below the option's strike price when expiration arrives, the option owner buyer can exercise the put option, forcing the writer to buy the underlying stock at the strike price.

That allows the exerciser buyer to profit from the difference between the stock's market price and the option's strike price. But if the stock's market price is above the option's strike price at the end of expiration day, the option expires worthless, and the owner's loss is limited to the premium fee paid for it the writer's profit. The seller's potential loss on a naked put can be substantial. If the stock falls all the way to zero bankruptcyhis loss is equal to the strike price at which he must buy the stock to cover the option minus the premium received.

The potential upside is the premium received when selling the preis der put-options During the option's lifetime, if the stock moves lower, the option's premium may increase depending on how far the stock falls and how much time passes.

If it does, it becomes more costly to close the position repurchase the put, sold earlierresulting in a loss. If the stock price completely collapses before the put position is closed, the put writer potentially can face catastrophic loss. In order to protect the preis der put-options buyer from default, the put writer is required to post margin. The put buyer preis der put-options not need to post margin because the buyer would not exercise the option if it had a negative payoff.

A buyer thinks the price of a stock will decrease. He pays a premium which he will never get back, unless it is sold before it expires. The buyer has the right to sell the stock at the strike price. The writer receives a premium from the buyer. Preis der put-options the buyer exercises his option, the writer will buy the stock at the strike price.

If the buyer does not exercise his option, the writer's profit is the premium. A put option is said to have intrinsic value when the underlying instrument has a spot price S below the option's strike price K. Upon preis der put-options, a preis der put-options option is valued at K-S if it is " in-the-money ", otherwise its value is zero.

Preis der put-options to exercise, an option has preis der put-options value apart from its intrinsic value. The following factors reduce the time value of a put option: Option pricing is a central problem of financial mathematics.

Trading options involves a constant monitoring of the option preis der put-options, which is affected preis der put-options changes in the base asset price, volatility and time decay. Moreover, the dependence of the preis der put-options option value to those factors is not linear — which makes the analysis even more complex. The graphs clearly shows the non-linear dependence of the option value to the base asset price. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. This article needs additional citations for verification.

Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. November Learn how and when to remove this template message. Energy derivative Freight derivative Inflation derivative Property derivative Weather derivative. Retrieved from " https: Articles needing additional references from November All articles needing additional references. Views Read Edit View history.

This page was last edited on 18 Januaryat By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

Real estate broker license online classes pa

  • Cheapest futures broker

    Options trading reviews

  • Ebook binary option sheriff

    Scottrade options assignment risk

Best binary options trading signal software for mac os x

  • Binary options live signals franco de vita

    Online trading ubs

  • Trading canadian stock and brokerage service

    Option short stock term trading strategies that work

  • Earn money online dubai

    Division method in binary trading review

60 seconds or turbo binary options signals

49 comments Current news about forex market

Trader forum 2018 miami

In financial mathematics , put—call parity defines a relationship between the price of a European call option and European put option , both with the identical strike price and expiry, namely that a portfolio of a long call option and a short put option is equivalent to and hence has the same value as a single forward contract at this strike price and expiry. This is because if the price at expiry is above the strike price, the call will be exercised, while if it is below, the put will be exercised, and thus in either case one unit of the asset will be purchased for the strike price, exactly as in a forward contract.

The validity of this relationship requires that certain assumptions be satisfied; these are specified and the relationship is derived below. In practice transaction costs and financing costs leverage mean this relationship will not exactly hold, but in liquid markets the relationship is close to exact. Put—call parity is a static replication , and thus requires minimal assumptions, namely the existence of a forward contract.

In the absence of traded forward contracts, the forward contract can be replaced indeed, itself replicated by the ability to buy the underlying asset and finance this by borrowing for fixed term e. These assumptions do not require any transactions between the initial date and expiry, and are thus significantly weaker than those of the Black—Scholes model , which requires dynamic replication and continual transaction in the underlying.

Replication assumes one can enter into derivative transactions, which requires leverage and capital costs to back this , and buying and selling entails transaction costs , notably the bid-ask spread.

The relationship thus only holds exactly in an ideal frictionless market with unlimited liquidity. However, real world markets may be sufficiently liquid that the relationship is close to exact, most significantly FX markets in major currencies or major stock indices, in the absence of market turbulence.

The left side corresponds to a portfolio of long a call and short a put, while the right side corresponds to a forward contract. The assets C and P on the left side are given in current values, while the assets F and K are given in future values forward price of asset, and strike price paid at expiry , which the discount factor D converts to present values. In this case the left-hand side is a fiduciary call , which is long a call and enough cash or bonds to pay the strike price if the call is exercised, while the right-hand side is a protective put , which is long a put and the asset, so the asset can be sold for the strike price if the spot is below strike at expiry.

Both sides have payoff max S T , K at expiry i. Note that the right-hand side of the equation is also the price of buying a forward contract on the stock with delivery price K.

Thus one way to read the equation is that a portfolio that is long a call and short a put is the same as being long a forward. In particular, if the underlying is not tradeable but there exists forwards on it, we can replace the right-hand-side expression by the price of a forward.

However, one should take care with the approximation, especially with larger rates and larger time periods. When valuing European options written on stocks with known dividends that will be paid out during the life of the option, the formula becomes:.

We can rewrite the equation as:. We will suppose that the put and call options are on traded stocks, but the underlying can be any other tradeable asset.

The ability to buy and sell the underlying is crucial to the "no arbitrage" argument below. First, note that under the assumption that there are no arbitrage opportunities the prices are arbitrage-free , two portfolios that always have the same payoff at time T must have the same value at any prior time.

To prove this suppose that, at some time t before T , one portfolio were cheaper than the other. Then one could purchase go long the cheaper portfolio and sell go short the more expensive.

At time T , our overall portfolio would, for any value of the share price, have zero value all the assets and liabilities have canceled out. The profit we made at time t is thus a riskless profit, but this violates our assumption of no arbitrage.

We will derive the put-call parity relation by creating two portfolios with the same payoffs static replication and invoking the above principle rational pricing.

Consider a call option and a put option with the same strike K for expiry at the same date T on some stock S , which pays no dividend. We assume the existence of a bond that pays 1 dollar at maturity time T. The bond price may be random like the stock but must equal 1 at maturity. Let the price of S be S t at time t. Now assemble a portfolio by buying a call option C and selling a put option P of the same maturity T and strike K. The payoff for this portfolio is S T - K.

Now assemble a second portfolio by buying one share and borrowing K bonds. Note the payoff of the latter portfolio is also S T - K at time T , since our share bought for S t will be worth S T and the borrowed bonds will be worth K. Thus given no arbitrage opportunities, the above relationship, which is known as put-call parity , holds, and for any three prices of the call, put, bond and stock one can compute the implied price of the fourth.

In the case of dividends, the modified formula can be derived in similar manner to above, but with the modification that one portfolio consists of going long a call, going short a put, and D T bonds that each pay 1 dollar at maturity T the bonds will be worth D t at time t ; the other portfolio is the same as before - long one share of stock, short K bonds that each pay 1 dollar at T.

The difference is that at time T , the stock is not only worth S T but has paid out D T in dividends. Forms of put-call parity appeared in practice as early as medieval ages, and was formally described by a number of authors in the early 20th century. The Early History of Regulatory Arbitrage , describes the important role that put-call parity played in developing the equity of redemption , the defining characteristic of a modern mortgage, in Medieval England. In the 19th century, financier Russell Sage used put-call parity to create synthetic loans, which had higher interest rates than the usury laws of the time would have normally allowed.

Nelson, an option arbitrage trader in New York, published a book: His book was re-discovered by Espen Gaarder Haug in the early s and many references from Nelson's book are given in Haug's book "Derivatives Models on Models". Engham Wilson but in less detail than Nelson Mathematics professor Vinzenz Bronzin also derives the put-call parity in and uses it as part of his arbitrage argument to develop a series of mathematical option models under a series of different distributions.

The work of professor Bronzin was just recently rediscovered by professor Wolfgang Hafner and professor Heinz Zimmermann. The original work of Bronzin is a book written in German and is now translated and published in English in an edited work by Hafner and Zimmermann "Vinzenz Bronzin's option pricing models", Springer Verlag.

Its first description in the modern academic literature appears to be by Hans R. Stoll in the Journal of Finance. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Options, Futures and Other Derivatives 5th ed. Energy derivative Freight derivative Inflation derivative Property derivative Weather derivative.

Retrieved from " https: Finance theories Mathematical finance Options finance. All articles with unsourced statements Articles with unsourced statements from June Articles with unsourced statements from July Views Read Edit View history. This page was last edited on 4 April , at By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.